I'll be using a Taimya 1/48 F4U-1 and marking it something like this depending on what decal sets I can get.

*Edit, The silly language filter changed the name of the thread !
Moderator: T3hGuppy





I think we learned how to do it because of the Seafire having the same issues. I could be wrong and usually amTwokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:12 pm Did a double take on the title, but I get it
The Brits did the job and figured how to land these long nosed beasts on carriers....otherwise the corsair would have been an afterthought.
Good luck in your build![]()


I read something on it how the US testing had many landing accidents and they gave up on carrier based corsair and dumped them on the Brits. The latter figured if they did an angled approach so as to give clear side vision then swing in at last second and drop her on the deck. Smart bunchStokesy44 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:54 pmI think we learned how to do it because of the Seafire having the same issues. I could be wrong and usually amTwokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:12 pm Did a double take on the title, but I get it
The Brits did the job and figured how to land these long nosed beasts on carriers....otherwise the corsair would have been an afterthought.
Good luck in your build![]()
![]()
Yep, sounds right. In a Seafire the pilots couldn't see the carrier at all during landing unless they did the curved approach.Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:01 pm
I read something on it how the US testing had many landing accidents and they gave up on carrier based corsair and dumped them on the Brits. The latter figured if they did an angled approach so as to give clear side vision then swing in at last second and drop her on the deck. Smart bunch

Makes for some brown alert style approach. Yet the accident rate was probably less than the regular approach. I would bet.Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2017 12:07 amYep, sounds right. In a Seafire the pilots couldn't see the carrier at all during landing unless they did the curved approach.Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:01 pm
I read something on it how the US testing had many landing accidents and they gave up on carrier based corsair and dumped them on the Brits. The latter figured if they did an angled approach so as to give clear side vision then swing in at last second and drop her on the deck. Smart bunch















True of the Spitfire and any long nosed tail dragger, curved approaches were essential. The RAF today still do oval circuits and curved approaches compared with the square circuits you will see at civvy airfields.In a Seafire the pilots couldn't see the carrier at all during landing unless they did the curved approach.
Because you are probably a lot more patient and better modeler than me ! LOL







It is scary for sure, but the Tamiya kit comes with the flaps in multiple parts fortunately !




Yep those are the ones. I got number 3 I think it is as it has a range of aircraft. I couldn't see the point of buying a sheet of decals with 5 or 6 Corsairs on it, this one has a Martlet, Avenger etcjnbattleship wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2017 3:18 pm Did you get the xtradecal Yanks with roundels? I used them previously on few 72 projects (both hellcat and wildcat) and found them to be very interesting line-up of subjects. Your Yank looks terrific so far.











